September 10th 2005

  Buy Issue 2715

Articles from this issue:

CANBERRA OBSERVED: The Telstra sale and economic ideology

EDITORIAL: Telstra: a better way forward . . .

SPECIAL FEATURE: The human cost of sexual exploitation (Part 1)

BIOETHICS: Review of cloning and embryo research laws

ECONOMICS: What future for globalism?

PRIMARY INDUSTRY: Pork farmers under attack on two fronts

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Revolting students / Precondition for education / Drugs and Asia / Swallow insult / Waldheimer's disease / Warning shadows

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: China frustrates Taiwan's bid to play bigger role

TAIWAN: Fostering democracies on the Pacific Rim

VIETNAM: Remembering the battle of Long Tan

CINEMA: Romantic comedy 'Wedding Crashers' lauds boys behaving badly

Competition Policy killing cane-farmers (letter)

Cornelia Rau not Australian (letter)

Elephant in the room (letter)

Profits for the people (letter)

Rights deprivation syndrome (letter)

BOOKS: The Criminalization of Christianity, by Janet L. Folger


Books promotion page

Competition Policy killing cane-farmers (letter)

by Carol Mackee

News Weekly, September 10, 2005

Roger Kelly is mistaken in saying that the problem we cane-farmers have in getting a decent deal from CSR and Bundaberg Sugar mills has "nothing to do with the much-maligned National Competition Policy" (News Weekly, August 27, 2005).

The previous statutory collective bargaining and compulsory arbitration régime between farmers and millers was our assurance of a fair price. Contained in Queensland's Sugar Industry Act, that system was deemed to be contrary to the rules of National Competition Policy.

This was stated clearly in the 2002 Memorandum of Understanding, signed by the Federal and Queensland Governments:

"The [two] Governments agree that the following areas appear to impede increased competitiveness and efficiency, and are detrimental to cultural change and innovation: the cane production area system; the statutory bargaining system; and the compulsory acquisition of raw sugar for marketing and selling within the domestic market.

"The Governments agree that there should be a joint approach to identify what legislative changes are required to remove these impediments."

In fact, the National Competition Council's August 2003 Assessment of government's progress in implementing the National Competition Policy and related reforms (Vol 2) says it all.

That report states that because the Queensland Government had, among other things, introduced legislation to abolish the statutory bargaining system and provide for a "voluntary system of mediation and arbitration of disputes over agreements between growers and millers", it had "substantively implemented" its 1995 Competition Policy Agreement "obligations" (p.152).

Mr Kelly misses the point. Under the new deregulated system - forced on us by National Competition Policy - farmers have lost their effective bargaining power with proprietary mills, such as CSR and Bundaberg Sugar.

Carol Mackee,
Ingham, Qld.

The perfect gift for
the thinker in the family.
The Best of News Weekly: 2014-2016, 320pp, $35

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

OPINION The Victorian ALP observed from up close

COVER STORY Caution with gender transitioning: children's futures at risk

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coal-Hand ScoMo pulls off an accidental coup

COVER STORY Current policies leave farmers high and dry in drought

EDITORIAL Power companies in clover after closures

EDITORIAL Turnbull the architect of his own demise

CANBERRA OBSERVED Captain and Lieutenant's $444 million munificence

© Copyright 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm