September 13th 2008

  Buy Issue 2788

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY / EDITORIAL: How America's choice will affect Australia

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Rudd's threat to close non-performing schools

FOREIGN INVESTMENT: Stronger rules needed on foreign investment

AGRICULTURE: High stakes in federal quarantine inquiry

EDUCATION: Reflections on home-schooling

UNITED NATIONS: Australia should not sign UN women's rights protocol

VICTORIA: Victoria battles over so-called 'right to kill'

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM: Bid to tax churches out of existence?

ADVERTISING: Protests force removal of offensive billboards

CHINA: How China topped the Olympic gold medal tally

UNITED STATES: Michelle Obama's separationist view of race

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Migration debate revisited / Migrating on the SS Urea (1970) / 2008 postscript

Mandated medical malpractice (letter)

BOOKS: ON BURCHETT, by Tibor Méray, Tibor Meray

BOOKS: THE ISRAEL LOBBY and US Foreign Policy, by John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt

Books promotion page

Rudd's threat to close non-performing schools

News Weekly, September 13, 2008
The bid to lift schools' performance is a test of Kevin Rudd's leadership, and one he must win.

Kevin Rudd's bold education plan is arguably his first serious policy initiative since becoming Prime Minister.

It is also unequivocally traditional Labor policy, and good policy at the same time.

But the question remains: does the Prime Minister have the commitment and the courage to follow through on the pledge to lift the failing bottom 20 per cent of Australia's schools?

The first nine months of the Rudd Government have been characterised by frenetic activity, and some grand symbolic gestures (climate change and the apology to Aborigines), accompanied by dozens of reviews, committees and taskforces.

There has been FuelWatch and GroceryWatch, and arms-length monitoring of the behaviour of the banks without any punitive action from the Government.

Business fears

Trading in carbon emissions is to be introduced ahead of the world by 2010, but the complex policy is fast becoming bogged down inside the bureaucracy, while running up against genuine business fears that the scheme will cause many companies to go to the wall or overseas.

But very little of substance has emerged and no clear direction on where the Government wants to take the nation.

Hopefully, the first serious move on Mr Rudd's "Education Revolution" may be about to change that.

Mr Rudd wants schools' performances to be transparent, parents to be permitted to know how their schools compare with other schools in the same demographic, and to take decisive action against those schools which continue to fail to make the grade.

"I cannot understand why public institutions such as schools should not be accountable to the community that funds their salaries and running costs," Mr Rudd told the National Press Club.

"Right now, we do not have accurate, comprehensive information to allow rigorous analysis of what schools and students are achieving.

"This must change.... Parents have a right to information to inform their family's decision-making about school enrolment."

Mr Rudd said he is determined to make individual school performance reporting a pre-condition of the new national education funding agreement with the states, which kicks off in January next year.

At stake are the lives of hundreds of thousands of children who have been left behind by a flawed and dysfunctional education system.

Also at stake is Mr Rudd's leadership, because he has staked his prime ministership on being able to make co-operative federalism work at a unique time in Australian history - when all governments, federal, state and territory, are Labor.

Education Minister Julia Gillard recently argued that the education system is failing the bottom 20 per cent of students, leaving around 500,000 young people in a "twilight zone" in which they are neither working nor studying.

And every year another 50,000 school-leavers move into this zone.

The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) also recently reported that Australia was languishing at 23 on the table of nations for completing the equivalent of Year 12 or gaining a trade qualification.

Only 75 per cent of Australians complete Year 12, and Mr Rudd has promised to lift this to 90 per cent by 2020.

During the National Press Club speech, Mr Rudd threw in the following words:

"Where, despite best efforts, these schools are not lifting their performance, the Commonwealth expects education authorities to take serious action such as replacing the school principal, replacing senior staff, reorganising the school or even merging that school with other more effective schools."

It is still not clear whether this threat to close non-performing schools, or sack principals and staff, was an afterthought or whether it was always integral to the policy, but it certainly secured the headlines the following day and ignited a fierce debate.

The Government was immediately at war with one of its strongest supporters - the teacher unions.

Furious unions

Ms Gillard was given the job of having to placate the furious unions which had thrown enormous resources into backing Labor at the last election.

Ms Gillard stressed the Rudd Government's threat was part of a much broader package of measures, including the offer to give poor schools an extra $500,000 a year in funding to help them lift their standards.

Nevertheless, Mr Rudd's ultimatum for schools to improve or be closed puts the government at loggerheads with the teachers, and the states which will have to implement the policy.

Mr Rudd has no power of his own to close a school or sack a principal. He can only use coercive powers to force the states into punitive action.

The bid to lift schools' performance is a test of Mr Rudd's leadership, and one he must win if his prime ministership is to be remembered.

It would also be tragic indeed if Mr Rudd's education revolution descended into TeacherWatch, and hundreds of thousands of lives were diminished as a result.

All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

COVER STORY Coronavirus: China must answer hard questions

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal Pell's appeal in the High Court this week

COVER STORY Beyond the Great Divide

CLIMATE POLITICS Business joins Big Brother in climate-change chorus

COVER STORY Murray River full; reservoirs low; farms for sale ...

ILLICIT DRUGS Cannabis marketed to children in Colorado

EDITORIAL Holden, China, covid19: Time for industry reset

© Copyright 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm