June 8th 2013

  Buy Issue 2901

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Survey reveals left-wing slant of ABC journalists

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Julia Gillard's worst tactical mistake

EDITORIAL: After the Ford closure: the future of the car industry

NATIONAL REFERENDUM: Hidden dangers in local government referendum

OPINION: Unwaged mums forgotten in baby bonus cut

AGRICULTURE: Animal cruelty in Indonesia: was it a set-up?

WORLD CONGRESS OF FAMILIES VII: Sydney hosts exhilarating World Congress of Families

MARRIAGE: The traditional family remains the most treasured relationship

EUTHANASIA: NSW parliament rejects euthanasia bill

HUMAN RIGHTS: Sydney Uni under fire over Chinese transplant surgeon

LIFE ISSUES: Abortion: the ultimate child abuse

CULTURE: Navigating contemporary culture: The importance of good reading

UNITED STATES: America's Boy Scouts to accept open homosexuals

SCHOOLS: National curriculum's crusade against Christianity

CINEMA: Lords of war or lords of peace?

BOOK REVIEW History's verdict on Mao

Books promotion page

National curriculum's crusade against Christianity

by Dr Kevin Donnelly

News Weekly, June 8, 2013

Gonski and school funding are front and centre as an election issue. Equally important is Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s national crusade in education and her attempts to impose a culturally left, politically-correct curriculum on all Australian schools.

The most recent example is the national civics and citizenship curriculum, where religion is rarely mentioned and Christianity is airbrushed from the nation’s civic life. It’s no secret that secular critics want to banish religion from the public square and ignore the essential role Christianity plays in the story of Western civilisation.

While students are told to study “religious groups to which Australians of Asian heritage belong”, there is no such compulsion in relation to European religions such as Catholicism or Anglicanism.

Additional evidence that those responsible for the curriculum are hostile to Christianity is what has been deleted from an earlier draft of the document.

The October 2012 copy recognises religion when, under the heading, “Civics and Citizenship knowledge and understanding”, students are told to learn about “the role and contribution of major religions and beliefs… to the development of [Australian] civic identity”.

Not only does the May 2013 edition remove the above reference, it also removes the statement that students should learn about “the role and contribution of … voluntary, community, interest and religious groups, associations and clubs to civic life”.

As to why religion is ignored, the answer is easy to find. In a report on the consultation process related to the curriculum, those responsible are content to argue, “The treatment of religion within the paper needs to be reviewed to include more reference to ‘non-religious’ views.”

The authors are also happy to embrace a politically-correct, postmodern view of society. Their belief is that Australia is “a secular nation with a multicultural and multi-faith society”, one that is “diverse and dynamic” and where students are taught to “value their own cultures, languages and beliefs”.

In addition to adopting a relativistic stance, the curriculum also embodies a subjective definition of citizenship on the premise that “citizenship means different things to people at different times and depending on personal perspectives, their social situation and where they live”.

Taken to its conclusion the statement denies the existence of those common values, beliefs and system of morality that all must agree to and defend if society is to survive and prosper.

Without agreement that all citizens are imbued with what the US Declaration of Independence terms “certain unalienable rights”, we are defenceless against the threat represented by totalitarian regimes.

Also ignored, while Australian society has evolved and we are now more diverse, is that we are inherently a Christian society and that religion has played, and continues to play, a vital role in the nation’s civic life and political and legal systems.

While there is no state-mandated religion, the preamble to the nation’s Constitution includes the words, “humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God”, and the nation’s parliaments commence with the saying of the Lord’s Prayer.

While the proportion has declined over the years, moving from 73% in 1986 to 61% in 2011, the reality is that the majority of Australians still describe themselves as Christian.

It is also true, especially in relation to the Catholic Church, that religious organisations are major contributors to civil society. Charitable organisations such as the St Vincent de Paul Society and Caritas Australia, in addition to providing help and relief to the poor and disadvantaged, act to strengthen the relationships and bonds that build civil society.

Research both here and overseas suggests that faith-based schools, especially Catholic schools, are also effective in building social capital — a situation in which relationships are characterised by reciprocity and mutual obligation and trust.

It shouldn’t surprise us that the proposed national civics and citizenship curriculum belittles religion, especially Christianity. The Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) has form when it comes to undervaluing Australia’s Judeo-Christian heritage and traditions. An early draft of the history curriculum replaced BC and AD with the politically correct alternatives “before the common era” (BCE) and “common era” (CE).

And it’s not just history and civics and citizenship — every subject in the national curriculum from prep to Year 12 must give priority to Asian, Indigenous and sustainability perspectives, while Christianity is ignored.

Much of the current debate centres on Gillard’s Gonski-inspired school-funding model and whether non-government schools will suffer financially.

Equally as important is the issue of the new national curriculum, a curriculum that all schools must teach, as implementation is tied to funding.

The danger is that students in government schools will be taught a curriculum that fails to acknowledge the central role of Christianity in the nation’s history, political and legal institutions and civic life.

The danger for religious schools is that they will have to implement a secular, cultural-left curriculum that belittles and undervalues the very faith on which such schools are based.

Dr Kevin Donnelly is director of the Melbourne-based Education Standards Institute and author of Educating Your Child: It’s Not Rocket Science! (available from Freedom Publishing). 

Purchase this book at the bookshop:


All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

COVER STORY Coronavirus: China must answer hard questions

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal Pell's appeal in the High Court this week

COVER STORY Beyond the Great Divide

CLIMATE POLITICS Business joins Big Brother in climate-change chorus

COVER STORY Murray River full; reservoirs low; farms for sale ...

ILLICIT DRUGS Cannabis marketed to children in Colorado

EDITORIAL Holden, China, covid19: Time for industry reset

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm