March 1st 2014

  Buy Issue 2918

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Union-related corruption: the issue that won't go away

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Royal commission will hit unions financially and politically

RURAL AFFAIRS: Push for a rural reconstruction bank

FAMILY LAW: The innocent victims of 'no-fault' divorce

EDITORIAL: Indonesia's elections and Australia's future

BORDER PROTECTION: Abbott stops illegal boat arrivals on Australia's shores

QUEENSLAND: Bill Glasson's support for 'gay' marriage cost him Griffith win

EUROPE: Belgium extends euthanasia to children

ILLICIT DRUGS: The folly of decriminalising cannabis

ILLICIT DRUGS: Crime-fighters brace for swelling tide of 'ice'

CONSERVATION: Eco-activists' bid to protect man-eating predators

WESTERN CIVILISATION: Ronald Reagan on religious tolerance

GOOD FOOD: There are ants and there are grasshoppers

OPINION: Are we really a clever country?


CULTURE: A day for vitriol and Valentines?

BOOK REVIEW Absorbing account of rise of new superpower

Books promotion page


News Weekly, March 1, 2014

Marriage ‘equality’ threat to ministers of religion


I was very pleased to read that the federal Attorney-General George Brandis has instructed the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) to identify provisions in Commonwealth legislation that “unreasonably encroach upon traditional rights, freedoms and privileges” (News Weekly, February 1, 2014).

It may be of interest to your readers to know that I have recently reviewed the Marriage Equality Amendment Bill 2013, which was introduced in the Senate late last year by Senator Sarah Hanson-Young (Greens, South Australia).

The bill’s declared purpose is “to amend the Marriage Act 1961 to create the opportunity for marriage equality for people regardless of their sex, sexual orientation or gender identity, and for related purposes”.

Sec.8 of the bill reads as follows: “To avoid doubt, the amendments made by this Schedule do not limit the effect of Sec 47 (ministers of religion not bound to solemnise marriage etc) of the Marriage Act 1961)”.

Prima facie, it would appear therefore that the traditional rights, freedoms and privileges of ministers of religion will not be trampled should this bill pass both houses of federal parliament.

Unfortunately, this is not the case.

In August 2013, a number of substantive amendments were made to the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 by our federal parliament.

The objects clause — that is, the statement of the underlying purposes — of this act includes the removal of discrimination in the administration of Commonwealth laws on the grounds of sexual orientation.

Section 5A of the act states that discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation occurs when an aggrieved person is treated less favourably in the same or similar circumstances than a person with a different sexual orientation.

The administration of Commonwealth laws under the act includes the performance of a function or the exercise of a power under a Commonwealth law.

This would apply to ministers of religion who have the power to solemnise marriages under the Marriage Act 1961.

By virtue of sec 5A of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984, these ministers of religion will be prohibited from refusing to solemnise same-sex marriages if the Marriage Equality Amendment Bill 2013 is enacted and in spite of the exemption appearing under sec 8 of that bill.

To make matters worse, should a state government amends its own equal opportunity legislation to counter this, the state legislation will be inoperative as it will conflict with the Commonwealth’s.

This is a scandalous state of affairs which we should only expect to arise in totalitarian countries, but not in a country like Australia.

I am sure many Australians, including clergy, are ignorant of this.

I hope that the ALRC will pick up on this important encroachment of the rights of church marriage celebrants when it conducts its review.

Undoubtedly, News Weekly and many of its readers will make their concerns known to Attorney General George Brandis in this regard.

The question is: will this be enough to stop the tide?

Gerard Goiran,
Forrestfield, WA



Thanks for nothing


On behalf of all International Harvester, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Volkswagen, Ford, Holden and Toyota employees, I’d like to thank the free-trade advocates for their level playing-field policies, which have led to the total destruction of the car manufacturing industry in this nation.

No doubt they will be congratulating themselves on the loss of over 100,000 Aussie jobs, which have now gone offshore forever.

I’d also like to thank the spineless CEOs of these companies that have allowed both major political parties to bully them into accepting the government’s free-trade agenda. Well done, guys, for such a perfunctory display of leadership.

Alan Barron,
Grovedale, Vic. 

All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

COVER STORY Coronavirus: China must answer hard questions

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal Pell's appeal in the High Court this week

CLIMATE POLITICS Business joins Big Brother in climate-change chorus

COVER STORY Beyond the Great Divide

COVER STORY Murray River full; reservoirs low; farms for sale ...

ILLICIT DRUGS Cannabis marketed to children in Colorado

EDITORIAL Holden, China, covid19: Time for industry reset

© Copyright 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm